Khurpi
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Gender
  • Personal Features
Politics 0

Jayaprakash Narayan’s Convocation address at Aligarh Muslim University in 1968

By Adil Hossain @adilhossain · On February 7, 2016

Share on Facebook

Facebook

0Tweet about this on Twitter

Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Linkedin

Pin on Pinterest

Pinterest

0

Recently Aligarh Muslim University was in the news after Attorny General of India Mukul Rohtagi argued before the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court that it is not a minority institution as it was brought into place by an Act of Parliament in 1920. Former Registrar and Dean of Faculty of Law at AMU and presently the Vice-Chancellor of NALSAR, Hyderabad Professor Faizan Mustafa rebutted this submission by Mr. Rohtagi in an interview published in Scroll and said that the present Modi government “may have a problem with the world Muslim”.

In this backdrop, we at Khurpi has decided to republish excerpts(as it was published in Janata) from the convocation address by Shri Jayaprakash Narayan, Sarvodaya leader delivered at Aligarh Muslim University on 10 February, 1968.

Source: Janata (weekly from Bombay founded by Jayaprakash Narayan), 17 March 1968, p.5

——————————————

You all know of the revolutionary role played by this university and its great founder in breaking down the barriers of obscurantism and in tearing off the blinkers of a past– a past that was no doubt glorious but that effectively hid the present and obstructed the view into the future– and thus in introducing the Muslim community into the world of modern knowledge.

In many ways the present situation is similar to that encountered by Sir Syed Ahmad Khan. The passage of the Mughal empire and its replacement by British Raj were such a shattering experience for the Muslims of those times that it took the genius of Sir Syed and his colleagues to enable the Muslim community to make a creative adjustment to the changed conditions. One may argue whether the adjustment made was the wisest in the long-range view; but, it was not easy then, in the face of the rising sun of an alien empire, to visualize at once its eventual passage and replacement by an indigenous power.

Alive and Kicking

Though, at the height of the Mughal empire the issue of ‘Muslim power v Hindu power’ had seemed to have been finally settled, it was soon after made clear that the issue was alive and kicking. The rise of the British power only pushed the issue aside. Even in those early days, it slowly became clear that there were two ways of resolving the issue. One was for each of the contending communities to try to ally itself with the foreign power in order to secure for itself the maximum benefit. That meant indefinite continuance of the foreign power, and suited it extremely well, The other was for both the communities to combine to expel the foreigner and share power together.

What happened in the event is an oft-told tale, and it will serve little purpose to dwell upon it here. Suffice it to say that at this university too, there were contenders for both philosophies, with perhaps the overall bent being towards the first. For his part, the foreigner did his best to keep it wholly under his sheltering wings, but it is clear that he did not quite succeed, witness the contribution made by the alumni of this universiy to the composite national movement and to socio-economic radicalism; also witness one of them joining the non-cooperation movement and eventually coming to occupy the highest office in this secular and democratic state.

What is relevant to the present is that the old issue, in spite of the drastic surgery of partition, still continues to be of paramount importance. The reason is that though the feudal system has been destroyed, the feudal mentality persists. In that feudal system, the religion of the overlord at the top settles the issue decisively. In it, the sharing of power can only be nominal. It is only in a secular democracy that power can be shared. As long as the feudal mentality lasts, and the past dominates the minds of men, as it does in India, the question of ‘Hindu power and Muslim power’ will remain a vexed question and an open, running sore.

Difficult situation

The fact that after partition Pakistan decided in favour of Muslim power and constitutionally established what it called a Muslim state, in which the Hindu minority– the same is true of other minorities– was deliberately placed under certain disabilities, such as no non-Muslim can be the president of Pakistan, inevitably produced a reaction in this country. Accordingly, we have today open and hidden protagonists of the Hindu rashtra or Hindu state.

The hangover in the minds of Indian Muslims from the days of the two-nation theory and the psychological reaction to the militant Hindu rashtra movement place the Muslims in a most difficult situation.

To my mind the role of this premier Muslim university is cut out by this situation. As I concieve it, that role is to lead the Muslim intelligentsia out of the dilemma in which they are placed. I must at once say that is not by any means an easy role to play, nor can this university alone play it successfully. But the university will find in the enlightened social, economic, and political forces of the country its powerful and effective allies. What is needed is a clear and unaltering vision.

Unreal world

The process as I see it- equally valid for India and Pakistan- is growth out of the feudal mentality and stagnation, into the modern, democratic secular mind and radical, social, and economic transformation and development. To put it differently, the solvents of communal reaction, whether expressed in aspirations of domination or in those of isolationism and inward withdrawl, are democracy, secularism, socio-economic radicalism, and economic development.

As a reaction to militant Hindu nationalism, there is a movement among Muslims of isolation and separatism and withdrawl into a dream world that is not of the present or of the future, but of the past. I invite this university to draw the Muslims out of the unreal, artificial, self-regarding, self-satisfying world into the battleground where the fight for secular democracy, a revolutionary social order, and economic growth is being fought. To stand aside from the battle is to strengthen the forces working for a communal state.

Image courtsey- commons.wikimedia.org

Share on Facebook

Facebook

0Tweet about this on Twitter

Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Linkedin

Pin on Pinterest

Pinterest

0

AligarhAligarh Muslim UniversityFaizan Mustafafeudal mentalityHindu nationalismHindutvaIndian MuslimsJayaprakash NarayanJPMinority character of AMUminority institutionMuslim issuespartitiontwo nation theory
Adil Hossain

Adil Hossain

Adil Hossain is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Khurpi. He is presently enrolled as fully funded D.Phil International Development student at University of Oxford. Earlier he finished his MA Development and Rights at Goldsmiths, University of London on a Commonwealth Scholarship and MA Mass Communication from Aligarh Muslim University.Outlook magazine in 2010 profiled him among the top five youth Right to Information(RTI) Activists in India. He has earlier published in The Guardian, Scroll, Catch, DailyO, Sunday Guardian among others. Email adil.hossain@merton.ox.ac.uk

You Might Also Like

  • Politics

    More Embarrasment for Donald Trump

  • Politics

    A Critical Appraisal of the Samajwadi Party Government in UP

  • Culture

    Sarbjit: An Evocative Representation of a Truly Tragic Story

Subscribe to Khurpi

Get Articles in your inbox, it's FREE

Recent Articles

  • Notes on lonliness and living through a pandemic
  • Notes on undoing academic elitism
  • Why is Secret Superstar problematic and yet commendable?
  • The Sexual Politics of Dupatta
  • More Embarrasment for Donald Trump
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Team
  • Write for us
  • Comments Policy

About Khurpi

At Khurpi, we say we dig deep into everything. We don’t believe in reading the surface but in deep analysis of what’s happening around us. We question at every step and focus on the solutions. Why politics is mired with cynicism today? Why ethnocultural identities prosper even in the age of globalisation? Why we continue to live in a gendered world where patriarchy is still very much the norm? Read more

Search the Site

Archives

  • November 2020
  • June 2019
  • December 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014

Contributors

Sarwar Jahan Chowdhury
Surangama Guha

More

© 2014 Khurpi.com, Inc. All rights reserved.